Goldbard v. Abrams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldbard v. Abrams

286 A.D. 849, 143 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4336

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 6, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 286 A.D. 849 (Goldbard v. Abrams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldbard v. Abrams, 286 A.D. 849, 143 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4336 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to review a determination of the State Rent Administrator granting the landlords’ application for a certificate- of eviction, for the purpose of providing an apartment in a multiple dwelling for use and occupancy by a resident superintendent, it appears that the landlords had been fined for not providing a resident superintendent, as required by section 83 of the Multiple Dwelling Law. The tenant appeals from an order denying the petition and dismissing the proceeding. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (Matter of Gross v. McGoldrick, 283 App. Div. 1110, affd. 308 1ST. Y. 651.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Schmidt, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ. [See post, p. 864.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to review a determination of the State Rent Administrator granting the landlords’ application for a certificate- of eviction, for the purpose of providing an apartment in a multiple dwelling for use and occupancy by a resident superintendent, it appears that the landlords had been fined for not providing a resident superintendent, as required by section 83 of the Multiple Dwelling Law. The tenant appeals from an order denying the petition and dismissing the proceeding. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (Matter of Gross v. McGoldrick, 283 App. Div. 1110, affd. 308 1ST. Y. 651.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Schmidt, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ. [See post, p. 864.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 A.D. 849, 143 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldbard-v-abrams-nyappdiv-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack