Goldbach v. State
This text of 906 So. 2d 349 (Goldbach v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William GOLDBACH, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
William Goldbach, Madison, pro se.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Myra J. Fried, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
*350 PER CURIAM.
William Goldbach challenges the trial court's summary denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Goldbach challenges his qualification for Prison Releasee Reoffender sentencing. We find the claim to be legally sufficient and not refuted by the record. We therefore reverse the trial court's summary denial and remand for the trial court to attach portions of the record that conclusively refute the appellant's claim or to grant appropriate relief.
GUNTHER, WARNER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
906 So. 2d 349, 2005 WL 1630828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldbach-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.