Goldan v. Delaware & Eastern Railway Co.
144 A.D. 81, 128 N.Y.S. 939, 1911 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1628
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Goldan v. Delaware & Eastern Railway Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 144 A.D. 78 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 7, 1911·No. No. 2·Published
Opinion
The interlocutory judgment should be reversed, with costs,' and the demurrer sustained, with costs, with leave to the plaintiff to sérve an amended complaint upon payment of costs, on the authority of Goldan v. Delaware & Eastern Railway Co., No. 1 (114 App. Div. 78), decided herewith. • ‘
Ingraham, P. J., LauGhlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ., concurred.
Judgment reversed, with costs, and demurrer sustained, with costs, -with leave to plaintiff to amend on payment of costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goldan v. Delaware & Eastern Railway Co., 144 A.D. 81, 128 N.Y.S. 939, 1911 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1628 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).
144 A.D. 81 (Goldan v. Delaware & Eastern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sanger v. Price
114 A.D. 78 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)