Gold v. TOWN OF EAST HADDAM
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 103 Conn. App. 369 (AC 27952), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court err in its finding that the intent of the voters is a question of fact rather than a question of law to be determined by the language approved by the voters in a town meeting?
“2. Did the Appellate Court err in failing to find that uses which are incidental and secondary to the primary public school purpose do not require the taking to occur within six months of the referendum vote?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
938 A.2d 592 (Gold v. TOWN OF EAST HADDAM) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.