Gold v. TOWN OF EAST HADDAM

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Gold v. TOWN OF EAST HADDAM

938 A.2d 592, 285 Conn. 901, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 526

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedDecember 14, 2007

DocketSC 18067

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 938 A.2d 592 (Gold v. TOWN OF EAST HADDAM) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gold v. TOWN OF EAST HADDAM, 938 A.2d 592, 285 Conn. 901, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 526 (Colo. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 103 Conn. App. 369 (AC 27952), is granted, limited to the following issues:

*902 Decided December 14, 2007 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18067. John S. Bennet, in support of the petition. Leo Gold, in opposition.

“1. Did the Appellate Court err in its finding that the intent of the voters is a question of fact rather than a question of law to be determined by the language approved by the voters in a town meeting?

“2. Did the Appellate Court err in failing to find that uses which are incidental and secondary to the primary public school purpose do not require the taking to occur within six months of the referendum vote?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 103 Conn. App. 369 (AC 27952), is granted, limited to the following issues:

*902 Decided December 14, 2007 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18067. John S. Bennet, in support of the petition. Leo Gold, in opposition.

“1. Did the Appellate Court err in its finding that the intent of the voters is a question of fact rather than a question of law to be determined by the language approved by the voters in a town meeting?

“2. Did the Appellate Court err in failing to find that uses which are incidental and secondary to the primary public school purpose do not require the taking to occur within six months of the referendum vote?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

938 A.2d 592, 285 Conn. 901, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gold-v-town-of-east-haddam-conn-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack