Gold v. Sweezey
This text of 233 A.D. 856 (Gold v. Sweezey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order and judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for summary judgment denied, with ten dollars costs. There is an issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff procured a purchaser who was ready, willing and able to purchase defendant’s property on the terms and conditions demanded by defendant, which issue cannot be determined on a motion for summary judgment. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
233 A.D. 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gold-v-sweezey-nyappdiv-1931.