Gold v. Office of the State Auditor

14 Ct. Cl. 247
West Virginia Court of Claims·Decided October 26, 1982·No. CC-82-192a·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The claimants are attorneys who served as counsel for criminal indigents in juvenile, misdemeanor, or felony proceed[248] ings pursuant to the provisions of West Virginia Code, Chapter 51, Article 11. Claimants’ fees were denied by the respondent because the fund was exhausted.

The claimants also served as counsel for indigents in Mental Hygiene hearings by appointment of the Circuit Court of Marshall County, West Virginia, pursuant to the provisions of West Virginia Code, Chapter 27, Article 5. This statute provides for the payment of mental hygiene commissioner fees and attorney fees out of the “mental hygiene fund” by the State Auditor. West Virginia Code §27-5-4(i). Claimants’ fees were denied by the respondent as the fund was exhausted.

The factual situations in this claim are identical to that in Richard K. Swartling, et al. v. Office of the State Auditor, 13 Ct.Cl. 57 (1979). Accordingly, awards are made in the amounts indicated below to the claimants.

Needy Persons Fund — award of $1,140.50.

Mental Hygiene Fund — award of $42.50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gold v. Office of the State Auditor, 14 Ct. Cl. 247 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1982).

14 Ct. Cl. 247 (Gold v. Office of the State Auditor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Swartling v. Office of the State Auditor
13 Ct. Cl. 57 (West Virginia Court of Claims, 1979)