Gold v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co.
111 N.E.3d 321, 86 N.Y.S.3d 427, 32 N.Y.3d 1009
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors·Decided October 11, 2018·No. 143 SSM 21·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
***1010On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order, insofar as appealed from, reversed, without costs, and defendants' motion to compel plaintiff Melek Kartal to arbitrate granted. The parties now agree that the arbitration clauses in Kartal's agreements are enforceable (see Epic Sys. Corp. v. Lewis, --- U.S. ----,
Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gold v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co., 111 N.E.3d 321, 86 N.Y.S.3d 427, 32 N.Y.3d 1009 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2018).
111 N.E.3d 321 (Gold v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gold v. New York Life Ins. Co.
32 N.Y.3d 1009 (New York Court of Appeals, 2018)