Gold v. Miller Brick Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Gold v. Miller Brick Co.

283 N.W. 153, 66 S.D. 334, 1938 S.D. LEXIS 65

CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 30, 1938

DocketFile No. 8137.

StatusPublished

This text of 283 N.W. 153 (Gold v. Miller Brick Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gold v. Miller Brick Co., 283 N.W. 153, 66 S.D. 334, 1938 S.D. LEXIS 65 (S.D. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

The principal assignment argued by appellants deals with the sufficiency of the evidence to support certain findings of fact. No useful purpose will be served by detailing the evidence. Suffice it to say that we have carefully considered the *Page 335 record and are of the opinion that there is ample support for the findings in the evidence.

Other assignments have been examined and need not be discussed for the reason that no prejudice to appellants is shown.

The judgment and order of the trial court are affirmed.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The principal assignment argued by appellants deals with the sufficiency of the evidence to support certain findings of fact. No useful purpose will be served by detailing the evidence. Suffice it to say that we have carefully considered the *Page 335 record and are of the opinion that there is ample support for the findings in the evidence.

Other assignments have been examined and need not be discussed for the reason that no prejudice to appellants is shown.

The judgment and order of the trial court are affirmed.

All the Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 N.W. 153, 66 S.D. 334, 1938 S.D. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gold-v-miller-brick-co-sd-1938.