Gold v. Mehl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gold v. Mehl

247 A.D. 759

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 247 A.D. 759 (Gold v. Mehl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gold v. Mehl, 247 A.D. 759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to vacate a judgment in favor of respondent Herman entered in the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, order granting motion to dismiss the complaint under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and the judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to vacate a judgment in favor of respondent Herman entered in the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, order granting motion to dismiss the complaint under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and the judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 A.D. 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gold-v-mehl-nyappdiv-1936.