Gold v. Mehl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gold v. Mehl

247 A.D. 759

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

In an action to vacate a judgment in favor of respondent Herman entered in the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, order granting motion to dismiss the complaint under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and the judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to vacate a judgment in favor of respondent Herman entered in the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, order granting motion to dismiss the complaint under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and the judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Gold v. Mehl, 247 A.D. 759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

247 A.D. 759 (Gold v. Mehl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.