Gold v. Marshall

157 N.E. 699, 260 Mass. 492, 1927 Mass. LEXIS 1465
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1927
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 157 N.E. 699 (Gold v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gold v. Marshall, 157 N.E. 699, 260 Mass. 492, 1927 Mass. LEXIS 1465 (Mass. 1927).

Opinion

Wait, J.

There is nothing in this appeal. The evidence excluded was a statement made in the absence of the plaintiff by one partner to another, that he had paid the firm note in question.

It does not appear that the book entry offered was made in the books of the partnership, or that the trial judge found it to have been made in good faith, in the regular course of business, and before the beginning of the proceeding. Consequently G. L. c. 233, § 78, which makes books of account admissible in certain cases, has no application here.

No citation of authorities is necessary.

Order dismissing report affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Fatalo
185 N.E.2d 754 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1962)
Nichols v. Sefcik
349 P.2d 678 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1960)
Sordillo v. General Steel Products, Inc.
9 Mass. App. Dec. 94 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1955)
Scolponeti v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
5 Mass. App. Div. 423 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 N.E. 699, 260 Mass. 492, 1927 Mass. LEXIS 1465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gold-v-marshall-mass-1927.