Gold v. Lasher
This text of 230 A.D.2d 873 (Gold v. Lasher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In a proceeding to invalidate a petition designating Howard L. Lasher as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 10, 1996, for the nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the public office of Judge of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated July 31, 1996, which dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly dismissed the instant proceeding for lack of jurisdiction due to the petitioner’s failure to comply with the provisions of the order to show cause (see, Election Law § 16-116; Matter of Caruso v Nassau County Bd. of Elections, 186 AD2d 701; Matter of Washington v Mahoney, 71 AD2d 1047; cf., Matter of Previdi v Matthews, 185 AD2d 962, 963).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 A.D.2d 873, 646 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gold-v-lasher-nyappdiv-1996.