Gold v. John Danchak

City of New York Municipal Court

Gold v. John Danchak

195 Misc. 101, 89 N.Y.S.2d 295, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3966

DecidedNovember 12, 1948

StatusPublished

This text of 195 Misc. 101 (Gold v. John Danchak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gold v. John Danchak, 195 Misc. 101, 89 N.Y.S.2d 295, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3966 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Lobeto, J.

At the conclusion of the trial herein and upon the request of the landlord’s attorneys, the court withheld making its decision in order to give the landlord an opportunity to try to settle the matter and also to submit any law he desired.

The court has examined the authorities submitted by him and finds that they are not applicable here, and the court was informed by him two days ago that no settlement is possible between the parties and that it may render its decision.

On the authority of Giordano v. Loperfide (203 App. Div. 164) the court is constrained to hold that this occupant is not a squatter, and that the landlord must comply with the local laws which require him to obtain a certificate authorizing the institution of summary proceedings before applying to the court for an eviction.

This proceeding is therefore dismissed without prejudice to the commencement of such other proceedings as the landlord may be advised.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI