Gold v. Hotchkiss

7 Cow. 368
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1827·Published

Opinion

UTICA,

Where the counsefarethe same, only one lowed; the whti shall be an attorney orcounsel fee.

On motion to re-tax costs, the court decided, that where f^e attorney was also the counsel in the cause, the party recovering was not entitled to have both an attorney and counsel fee, on trial, taxed; but only one; and he might whicL (Vid. 2 R. L. 15, 16.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gold v. Hotchkiss, 7 Cow. 368 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).

7 Cow. 368 (Gold v. Hotchkiss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.