Gold v. Gold
254 A.D. 765, 6 N.Y.S.2d 142, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7524
Opinion
In an action for a judgment declaring plaintiff to be the sole owner and entitled to the possession of funds on deposit in a bank account, from which withdrawals may be made only upon the signature of both plaintiff and appellant, judgment in favor of plaintiff unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Davis, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gold v. Gold, 254 A.D. 765, 6 N.Y.S.2d 142, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7524 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).
254 A.D. 765 (Gold v. Gold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.