Gold v. Fisher

59 A.D.3d 443, 873 N.Y.S.2d 139
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 3, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by34 cases

This text of 59 A.D.3d 443 (Gold v. Fisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gold v. Fisher, 59 A.D.3d 443, 873 N.Y.S.2d 139 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Bennett, J.), dated March 31, 2008, which, after a hearing, denied his petition to vacate a child support order.

[444]*444Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

It is fundamental public policy in New York that parents are responsible for their children’s support until age 21 (see Family Ct Act § 413; Matter of Roe v Doe, 29 NY2d 188, 192-193 [1971]). Nevertheless, under the doctrine of constructive emancipation, “a child of employable age who actively abandons the noncustodial parent by refusing all contact and visitation” may forfeit any entitlement to support (Matter of Alice C. v Bernard G.C., 193 AD2d 97, 109 [1993]). “In contrast, where it is the parent who causes a breakdown in communication with his child, or has made no serious effort to contact the child and exercise his visitation rights, the child will not be deemed to have abandoned the parent” (id.).

“The burden of proof as to emancipation is on the party asserting it” (Schneider v Schneider, 116 AD2d 714, 715 [1986]). In this case, the evidence in the record sufficiently supports the Family Court’s finding that the father failed to meet his burden (see Radin v Rodin, 209 AD2d 396 [1994]; Matter of Alice C. v Bernard G.C., 193 AD2d at 110). Although the father and the daughter presented somewhat different reasons for their estrangement, we see no reason to disturb the Family Court’s decision to credit the daughter’s testimony (see Matter of Guevara v Ubillus, 47 AD3d 715, 716 [2008]; Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v Jones-Gamble, 227 AD2d 618, 619 [1996]; Matter of Drago v Drago, 138 AD2d 704, 705 [1988]).

The father’s remaining contention is without merit. Mastro, J.E, Florio, Balkin and Eng, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Langenhahn v. Langenhahn
2025 NY Slip Op 04570 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Matter of Shisgal v. Abels
2020 NY Slip Op 596 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of Jones v. Jones
2018 NY Slip Op 2966 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of Basile v. Wiggs
2017 NY Slip Op 8513 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Werner v. Werner
2017 NY Slip Op 6215 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Matter of Dejesus v. Dejesus
2017 NY Slip Op 5593 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Matter of Monti v. DiBedendetto
2017 NY Slip Op 4847 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Sanders v. Sanders
2017 NY Slip Op 3549 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Matter of Addimando v. Huerta
2017 NY Slip Op 641 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
O'Rourke v. O'Rourke
139 A.D.3d 1027 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Malloy v. O'Gorman
139 A.D.3d 733 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Brinskelle v. Widman
137 A.D.3d 1022 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
ONEIDA COUNTY D.S.S. v. CHRISTMAN, SR., CHARLES
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
Oneida County Department of Social Services v. Christman
125 A.D.3d 1409 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Cornell v. Cornell
47 Misc. 3d 605 (New York Supreme Court, 2015)
Jurgielewicz v. Johnston
114 A.D.3d 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Grucci v. Villanti
108 A.D.3d 626 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
SCHMITT, GERALD v. SCHMITT, SANDRA
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
Schmitt v. Schmitt
107 A.D.3d 1529 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 A.D.3d 443, 873 N.Y.S.2d 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gold-v-fisher-nyappdiv-2009.