Gold v. City of Miami
138 F.3d 886, 1998 WL 158495
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 7, 1998·No. No. 95-4996·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
(Opinion Sept. 17,1997,11th Cir., 121 F.3d 1442).
The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5), rehearing en banc is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gold v. City of Miami, 138 F.3d 886, 1998 WL 158495 (11th Cir. 1998).
138 F.3d 886 (Gold v. City of Miami) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Knowles v. the State
797 S.E.2d 197 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2017)
Gold v. City of Miami
138 F.3d 886 (Eleventh Circuit, 1998)