Gold v. Board of Education of Copaigue Union Free School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gold v. Board of Education of Copaigue Union Free School District

67 A.D.2d 729, 412 N.Y.S.2d 664, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10358

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 29, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 67 A.D.2d 729 (Gold v. Board of Education of Copaigue Union Free School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gold v. Board of Education of Copaigue Union Free School District, 67 A.D.2d 729, 412 N.Y.S.2d 664, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10358 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the respondent to conduct a hearing with respect to the petitioner’s physical condition other than in accordance with sections 3012 and 3020-a of the Education Law, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered September 25, 1978, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Respondent proceeded properly under section 511 of the Education Law. The hearing that the petitioner will have will satisfy her right to due process. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Suozzi and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the respondent to conduct a hearing with respect to the petitioner’s physical condition other than in accordance with sections 3012 and 3020-a of the Education Law, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered September 25, 1978, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Respondent proceeded properly under section 511 of the Education Law. The hearing that the petitioner will have will satisfy her right to due process. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Suozzi and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 A.D.2d 729, 412 N.Y.S.2d 664, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gold-v-board-of-education-of-copaigue-union-free-school-district-nyappdiv-1979.