Gold v. Bluvshtein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gold v. Bluvshtein

18 A.D.2d 671, 236 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6479

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 10, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 671 (Gold v. Bluvshtein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gold v. Bluvshtein, 18 A.D.2d 671, 236 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6479 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for injury to person and property and for loss of services and medical expenses, arising out of an automobile collision, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rings County, entered June 23,1959, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs’ motion: (a) to vacate a prior order, entered on their default, dismissing the complaint for lack of prosecution; and (b) to open their default. Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied. In our opinion, the Special Term improvidently exercised its discretion in vacating the prior order dismissing the complaint for plaintiffs’ failure to prosecute. The excuse that plaintiffs’ inactivity for 42 months after joinder of issue was due to inadvertence is insufficient to warrant vacatur of such prior order (Siegel v. City of New York, 16 A D 2d 679; Topp v. Casco Prods. Corp., 8 A D 2d 727; O’Rourke v. City of New York, 3 A D 2d 713; Mancino v. City of New York, 1 A D 2d 830; A. R. Hyde & Sons v. Roller Derby Skate Co., 1 A D 2d 942). Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for injury to person and property and for loss of services and medical expenses, arising out of an automobile collision, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rings County, entered June 23,1959, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs’ motion: (a) to vacate a prior order, entered on their default, dismissing the complaint for lack of prosecution; and (b) to open their default. Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied. In our opinion, the Special Term improvidently exercised its discretion in vacating the prior order dismissing the complaint for plaintiffs’ failure to prosecute. The excuse that plaintiffs’ inactivity for 42 months after joinder of issue was due to inadvertence is insufficient to warrant vacatur of such prior order (Siegel v. City of New York, 16 A D 2d 679; Topp v. Casco Prods. Corp., 8 A D 2d 727; O’Rourke v. City of New York, 3 A D 2d 713; Mancino v. City of New York, 1 A D 2d 830; A. R. Hyde & Sons v. Roller Derby Skate Co., 1 A D 2d 942). Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 671, 236 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gold-v-bluvshtein-nyappdiv-1962.