Gold Coast Medical Group v. Fasano

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gold Coast Medical Group v. Fasano

634 So. 2d 325, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3348, 1994 WL 120046

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 12, 1994

DocketNo. 93-156

StatusPublished

This text of 634 So. 2d 325 (Gold Coast Medical Group v. Fasano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gold Coast Medical Group v. Fasano, 634 So. 2d 325, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3348, 1994 WL 120046 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are asked to review a final order of a Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) finding a compensable injury and awarding temporary total disability benefits with interest and penalties. Because the findings of the JCC concerning the compensability of the injury and the entitlement to benefits are supported by competent substantial evidence, we affirm on these points.

The JCC awarded penalties on grounds that appellant’s notice to controvert was untimely under section 440.19(l)(e)7, Florida Statutes (1991). The employer/camer’s notice to controvert the compensability of the injury was filed before the claim itself. This suffices under City of West Palm Beach v. Burbaum, 632 So.2d 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). The award of penalties predicated on the supposed untimeliness of the notice to controvert must be reversed.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part.

ZEHMER, C.J., and KAHN and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI