Gold Coast Graphics, Inc. v. Rachline
This text of 448 So. 2d 544 (Gold Coast Graphics, Inc. v. Rachline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order dismissing the complaint for lack of prosecution with prejudice is reversed upon a holding that: (a) the notice of taking a deposition constituted activity sufficient to preclude dismissal, Silverman [545]*545v. Equifax Services, Inc., 420 So.2d 928 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); (b) a dismissal for failure to prosecute may not be “with prejudice,” McDaniel v. Onkey, 422 So.2d 70 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
448 So. 2d 544, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gold-coast-graphics-inc-v-rachline-fladistctapp-1984.