Gold Coast Graphics, Inc. v. Rachline

448 So. 2d 544, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12423
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 20, 1984
DocketNo. 83-2024
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 448 So. 2d 544 (Gold Coast Graphics, Inc. v. Rachline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gold Coast Graphics, Inc. v. Rachline, 448 So. 2d 544, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12423 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order dismissing the complaint for lack of prosecution with prejudice is reversed upon a holding that: (a) the notice of taking a deposition constituted activity sufficient to preclude dismissal, Silverman [545]*545v. Equifax Services, Inc., 420 So.2d 928 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); (b) a dismissal for failure to prosecute may not be “with prejudice,” McDaniel v. Onkey, 422 So.2d 70 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Abu-Hamdeh ex rel. Abu-Hamdeh v. Romero-Bolumen
889 So. 2d 879 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Jackson v. Layne
464 So. 2d 1242 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
448 So. 2d 544, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gold-coast-graphics-inc-v-rachline-fladistctapp-1984.