Gold Coast Graphics, Inc. v. Rachline
448 So. 2d 544, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12423
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 20, 1984·No. No. 83-2024·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The order dismissing the complaint for lack of prosecution with prejudice is reversed upon a holding that: (a) the notice of taking a deposition constituted activity sufficient to preclude dismissal, Silverman [545] v. Equifax Services, Inc., 420 So.2d 928 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); (b) a dismissal for failure to prosecute may not be “with prejudice,” McDaniel v. Onkey, 422 So.2d 70 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gold Coast Graphics, Inc. v. Rachline, 448 So. 2d 544, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12423 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
448 So. 2d 544 (Gold Coast Graphics, Inc. v. Rachline) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Abu-Hamdeh ex rel. Abu-Hamdeh v. Romero-Bolumen
889 So. 2d 879 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Jackson v. Layne
464 So. 2d 1242 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)