Gold, Cameron Laquincy v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: August 14, 2015
• Docket: PD-1047-15
• Status: Published

Opinion

NO. /4-/*/Pf?/¥-CR

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN

' Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

No. /^-/4^/^-CR In the Court of Appeals for the J

No. _l3^T?2£k_ In the 9 fa-^ District Court of Harris County, Texas

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

(a* Appellant, Pro Se

FILED IN fczeVillc /*• 7wcz- RECEIVED IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUG 14 2015 AUG 14 2015 Abel Acosta, Clerk Abe? Acosta, Cleft NO. /<^~/<^7;?/^-CR

Appellant,

Uo./¥'/¥OD3/

No. /?6~7106 In the 3 & z District Court of Harris County, Texas

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:

COMES NOW, Gt/ytfeo/o/JbritW Appellant, pro se, and files this Appellant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Discretionary Review.

In support of said Motion, Appellant shows the Court the following: The Appellant was convicted in the 3 6X- District Court of Harris County,

Texas, on or about , in Cause Number /?£7706? . styled The State

Of Texas V. //Zor&ien, %aQuIn/Lu£j.7>U••

II.

The /<$•& Court ofAppeals affirmed Appellant's conviction on ~7~2/-/S', in the case styled /^u^v,of.O^/CyMy. The State of Texas, in Cause Number f 9 (til06

III.

The deadline for filing the Petition for Discretionary Review (PDR) is

IV.

This is Appellant's first request for an extension of time.

Appellant's request for an extension of time is based on the following facts:

2/(? Lj/y}it <_S rur/--e*> pros€59 nf ^,Vl,;^j #W l~D<~k (3>oio/J due, ^q firinu&( sKakc/oi^rt Q-kc$ C6M.<±

/l/oi* rtjr>(p to ffff iotAp LaiaI Library +o get f>i~oppr }nifa<-r»-± WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant prays that the Court

grant an extension of 1,0 days until ^-^o-iS , to file Appellant's

PDR.

I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Texas that

the foregoing statements are true and correct.

Respectfully submitted,

Appellant, Pro Se T^/?Z//nrtWnnN ei IUN*'*