Golba v. Gajewski

17 N.E.2d 169, 301 Mass. 328, 1938 Mass. LEXIS 1046
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 26, 1938·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The record shows no abuse of discretion or other error of law in denying the motion for a new trial. Ogden v. Aspinwall, 220 Mass. 100, 105. Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway, 235 Mass. 482, 496-497, 502. Gallagher v. Boston Elevated Railway, 259 Mass. 33. Mantho v. Nelson, 285 Mass. 156, 158.

Order dismissing report affirmed with double costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Golba v. Gajewski, 17 N.E.2d 169, 301 Mass. 328, 1938 Mass. LEXIS 1046 (Mass. 1938).

17 N.E.2d 169 (Golba v. Gajewski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

York Realty, Inc. v. J.J. Daly, Inc.
1982 Mass. App. Div. 227 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1982)
Bartley v. Phillips
57 N.E.2d 26 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1944)
Orcutt v. Drillen
35 N.E.2d 483 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1940)