Goizueta v. State

507 So. 2d 1196, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1379, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8550
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 2, 1987
DocketNo. 86-2808
StatusPublished

This text of 507 So. 2d 1196 (Goizueta v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goizueta v. State, 507 So. 2d 1196, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1379, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8550 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As in Velunza v. State, 504 So.2d 780 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), we conclude that the evidence of the appellant’s participation in an attempted sale of cocaine to undercover police supports his conviction of trafficking; because there is no proof of a formal or implied agreement to commit the offense, however, his conviction of conspiracy to traffic must be reversed.

There is no merit in the claim that the state’s failure to produce the confidential informant requires a new trial. See State v. Gutierrez, 502 So.2d 481 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). The remaining points are entirely meritless.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Velunza v. State
504 So. 2d 780 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
State v. Gutierrez
502 So. 2d 481 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
507 So. 2d 1196, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1379, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goizueta-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.