Goit v. Joyce

Illinois Supreme Court

Goit v. Joyce

61 Ill. 489

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 15, 1871

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 61 Ill. 489 (Goit v. Joyce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goit v. Joyce, 61 Ill. 489 (Ill. 1871).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

There is not the slightest evidence in this record that Curtis, one of the defendants below, was under any liability to pay for the goods in controversy.

There is no proof of either an express or implied promise on his part; no proof that he had any knowledge of the purchase of the goods, or that he enjoyed any benefit from them.

The entiré evidence, so far as it shows any liability, only discloses a liability on the part of Goit.

As the judgment was against both appellants, it must be reversed, and the cause remanded. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

There is not the slightest evidence in this record that Curtis, one of the defendants below, was under any liability to pay for the goods in controversy.

There is no proof of either an express or implied promise on his part; no proof that he had any knowledge of the purchase of the goods, or that he enjoyed any benefit from them.

The entiré evidence, so far as it shows any liability, only discloses a liability on the part of Goit.

As the judgment was against both appellants, it must be reversed, and the cause remanded. Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 Ill. 489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goit-v-joyce-ill-1871.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack