Goist v. United States Bureau of Prisons

54 F. App'x 159
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 7, 2003
DocketNo. 02-7653
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 54 F. App'x 159 (Goist v. United States Bureau of Prisons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goist v. United States Bureau of Prisons, 54 F. App'x 159 (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Paul B. Goist, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief on his petition that it construed as filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Goist v. United States Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-02-2211-0-20-BD (D.S.C. Sept. 25, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harris v. Holzapfel
S.D. West Virginia, 2023
Hurt v. Southern Regional Jail
S.D. West Virginia, 2022
Green v. Rubenstein
644 F. Supp. 2d 723 (S.D. West Virginia, 2009)
Geiger v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
487 F. Supp. 2d 1155 (C.D. California, 2007)
Diaz v. Bann
540 U.S. 1054 (Supreme Court, 2003)
Goist v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
538 U.S. 1047 (Supreme Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 F. App'x 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goist-v-united-states-bureau-of-prisons-ca4-2003.