Goist v. United States Bureau of Prisons
This text of 54 F. App'x 159 (Goist v. United States Bureau of Prisons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Paul B. Goist, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief on his petition that it construed as filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Goist v. United States Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-02-2211-0-20-BD (D.S.C. Sept. 25, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 F. App'x 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goist-v-united-states-bureau-of-prisons-ca4-2003.