Goins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Goins v. State

367 S.W.3d 161, 2012 WL 1882195, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 700

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 22, 2012·No. No. ED 97154·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sean J. Goins appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035¹ motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sean J. Goins appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035¹ motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Goins v. State, 367 S.W.3d 161, 2012 WL 1882195, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 700 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

367 S.W.3d 161 (Goins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.