Goins v. Pineda

2011 Ohio 529, 128 Ohio St. 3d 358
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 9, 2011·No. 2010-1736·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the motion of appellant, Dana Goins, for leave to file a second petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Res judicata bars Goins from filing a successive habeas corpus petition to raise claims that he raised or could have raised in his previous petition. See State ex rel. Johnson v. Pineda, 126 Ohio St.3d 480, 2010-Ohio-4387, 935 N.E.2d 38, ¶ 1. 1

Judgment affirmed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.
1

. We deny appellant’s motion for oral argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goins v. Pineda, 2011 Ohio 529, 128 Ohio St. 3d 358 (Ohio 2011).

2011 Ohio 529 (Goins v. Pineda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hazel v. Knab
2011 Ohio 4608 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2011)