Goins v. Pineda

Ohio Supreme Court

Goins v. Pineda

2011 Ohio 529, 128 Ohio St. 3d 358

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 9, 2011

Docket2010-1736

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2011 Ohio 529 (Goins v. Pineda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goins v. Pineda, 2011 Ohio 529, 128 Ohio St. 3d 358 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the motion of appellant, Dana Goins, for leave to file a second petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Res judicata bars Goins from filing a successive habeas corpus petition to raise claims that he raised or could have raised in his previous petition. See State ex rel. Johnson v. Pineda, 126 Ohio St.3d 480, 2010-Ohio-4387, 935 N.E.2d 38, ¶ 1. 1

Judgment affirmed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

1

. We deny appellant’s motion for oral argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI