Goings v. White
33 Ind. 125
Opinion
The first paragraph of the complaint was insufficient, and the demurrer should have been sustained to it. .There is no averment that the plaintiff’ relied upon the representations of the defendant. The want of such averment cannot be supplied by a recital of evidence which might justify a presumption that the representations were relied upon, unless such evidence be conclusive of that fact.
The judgment is reversed, with costs; and the cause remanded, with directions to sustain the demurrer to the first paragraph of the complaint.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goings v. White, 33 Ind. 125 (Ind. 1870).
33 Ind. 125 (Goings v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Burden v. Burden
40 N.E. 1067 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1895)
Sioux Banking Co. v. Kendall
62 N.W. 377 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1895)
First National Bank v. North
51 N.W. 96 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1892)