Goings v. Florida Industrial Commission

200 So. 2d 537, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3458
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 21, 1967·No. No. 36261·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 1, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition and cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.

It is further ordered that the petitioner’s petition for allowance of attorneys’ fees, be and the same is hereby denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goings v. Florida Industrial Commission, 200 So. 2d 537, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3458 (Fla. 1967).

200 So. 2d 537 (Goings v. Florida Industrial Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clayton v. Lease-Way Transportation Corp.
236 So. 2d 765 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1970)