Goines v. State

670 So. 2d 1201, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3733, 1996 WL 165391
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 10, 1996·No. No. 94-1690·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

FARMER, Judge.

We reverse the trial court’s refusal to continue an evidentiary hearing on a rule 3.850 motion at the defendant’s request to obtain counsel. See Williams v. State, 472 So.2d [1202]*1202738 (Fla.1985). On remand, if the court should find that defendant is indigent and unable to obtain private counsel, the trial court shall exercise its discretion under Williams as to the appointment of counsel. We remind the trial judge that, an evidentia-ry hearing having previously been required on this particular, pending rule 3.850 motion, see Goines v. State, 632 So.2d 292 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), three of the four Williams criteria for the appointment of counsel have already been satisfied.

REVERSED.

GUNTHER, C.J., and WARNER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goines v. State, 670 So. 2d 1201, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3733, 1996 WL 165391 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

670 So. 2d 1201 (Goines v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goines v. State
708 So. 2d 656 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)