Gohlke, Keith v. Saul, Andrew

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

KEITH K. GOHLKE, Plaintiff, Vv. Case No, 3:20-CV -00770-BBC ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

ORDER ON THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)

Pursuant to the parties’ joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon substantive review, hereby enters an order under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) reversing the Commissioner’s decision with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner according to the following terms, See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296 (1993), Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 97-98 (1991). On remand, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) will offer Plaintiff the opportunity for a new hearing; proceed through the sequential disability evaluation process as appropriate; obtain supplemental vocational expert testimony if warranted; and issue anew decision.

SO ORDERED this ay ey of (1G 2021. —vtosta 2 Cheb Honor ble Barbara B. Crabb United States District Judge