Goheen v. Stirlen

139 N.E. 359, 193 Ind. 246, 1923 Ind. LEXIS 71
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 17, 1923
DocketNo. 24,201
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 139 N.E. 359 (Goheen v. Stirlen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goheen v. Stirlen, 139 N.E. 359, 193 Ind. 246, 1923 Ind. LEXIS 71 (Ind. 1923).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant prayed for an appeal, but did not perfect his appeal under the general statute governing appeals in civil cases. He insists that he complied with the statute (§2978 Burns 1914, Acts 1913 p. 65) governing appeals from decisions growing out of any matters connected with a decedent’s estate. But in an action to contest a will the appeal must be taken under the general statute. It is not a proceeding under the decedent’s act. Morell v. Morell (1901), 157 Ind. 179, 181, 60 N. E. 1092.

The appeal having been heretofore dismissed without an opinion.

The petition for rehearing is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Krick v. Farmers and Merchants Bank of Boswell
279 N.E.2d 254 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 N.E. 359, 193 Ind. 246, 1923 Ind. LEXIS 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goheen-v-stirlen-ind-1923.