Goglia v. Sardino
101 A.D.2d 1013, 476 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18744
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 25, 1984·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
— Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We affirm for the reasons stated at Special Term. We add only that, concerning the defense of the Statute of Limitations, the [1014]*1014respondents failed to state facts showing that the action was commenced more than four months after respondents’ refusal, upon demand of the petitioner, to perform their duty. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Grow, J. — art 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Denman, Boomer, Green and Schnepp, JJ. [119 Misc 2d 907.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goglia v. Sardino, 101 A.D.2d 1013, 476 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18744 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).
101 A.D.2d 1013 (Goglia v. Sardino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Uniform Firefighters of Cohoes v. City of Cohoes
731 N.E.2d 137 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)