Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Goglia v. Sardino

Goglia v. Sardino

101 A.D.2d 1013, 476 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18744
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 25, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 101 A.D.2d 1013 (Goglia v. Sardino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goglia v. Sardino, 101 A.D.2d 1013, 476 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18744 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We affirm for the reasons stated at Special Term. We add only that, concerning the defense of the Statute of Limitations, the [1014]*1014respondents failed to state facts showing that the action was commenced more than four months after respondents’ refusal, upon demand of the petitioner, to perform their duty. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Grow, J. — art 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Denman, Boomer, Green and Schnepp, JJ. [119 Misc 2d 907.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Uniform Firefighters of Cohoes v. City of Cohoes
731 N.E.2d 137 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 A.D.2d 1013, 476 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goglia-v-sardino-nyappdiv-1984.