Goglia v. Sardino
479 N.E.2d 250, 64 N.Y.2d 1084, 489 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 14222
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in its memorandum decision (see, 101 AD2d 1013) and in the decision of Justice John W. Grow at Special Term (119 Misc 2d 907; see also, Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v Loudermill, 470 US_, 105 S Ct 1487).
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goglia v. Sardino, 479 N.E.2d 250, 64 N.Y.2d 1084, 489 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 14222 (N.Y. 1985).
479 N.E.2d 250 (Goglia v. Sardino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
DeMasi v. Benefico
34 A.D.3d 472 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Heck v. Keane
6 A.D.3d 95 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Uniform Firefighters of Cohoes v. City of Cohoes
731 N.E.2d 137 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)