Home/New York Court of Appeals/Goglia v. Sardino

Goglia v. Sardino

479 N.E.2d 250, 64 N.Y.2d 1084, 489 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 14222
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 25, 1985
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 479 N.E.2d 250 (Goglia v. Sardino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goglia v. Sardino, 479 N.E.2d 250, 64 N.Y.2d 1084, 489 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 14222 (N.Y. 1985).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in its memorandum decision (see, 101 AD2d 1013) and in the decision of Justice John W. Grow at Special Term (119 Misc 2d 907; see also, Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v Loudermill, 470 US_, 105 S Ct 1487).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DeMasi v. Benefico
34 A.D.3d 472 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Heck v. Keane
6 A.D.3d 95 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Uniform Firefighters of Cohoes v. City of Cohoes
731 N.E.2d 137 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
479 N.E.2d 250, 64 N.Y.2d 1084, 489 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 14222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goglia-v-sardino-ny-1985.