Goggans v. Goggans

39 So. 2d 11, 252 Ala. 19, 1949 Ala. LEXIS 319
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedFebruary 24, 1949
Docket3 Div. 516.
StatusPublished

This text of 39 So. 2d 11 (Goggans v. Goggans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goggans v. Goggans, 39 So. 2d 11, 252 Ala. 19, 1949 Ala. LEXIS 319 (Ala. 1949).

Opinion

BROWN, Justice.

The appellee, Evelyn S. Goggans, sued her husband, W. L. Goggans, for divorce, alleging in her bill that the parties were of full age and bona fide residents of the State of Alabama; that the defendant Goggans is a resident of Butler 'County, the county in which the bill was filed, and at the time of the separation both parties lived in said county.

As grounds for such divorce, the bill alleges: “After said marriage, the complainant and respondent lived together as husband and wife until on towit: January 24, 1948, at which time, the respondent committed actual violence upon the person of the complainant attended with danger to her life or health, or from his conduct there was reasonable apprehension of such violence, that on towit: the 24th of January, 1948, the respondent struck the complainant and on, towit: January 25, 1948, respondent threatened to beat complainant. Complainant has not lived with *20 respondent since on towit: January 26, 1948. At the time of said acts of cruelty, the complainant and respondent were living in Greenville, Butler County, Alabama. + * *»

The defendant demurred to the bill challenging the sufficiency of its allegations to warrant relief under the provisions of § 22, Title 34, Code of 1940, which provides that a divorce may be granted in favor of the wife when the husband has committed actual violence on her person attended with danger to life or health or “when from his * * * conduct there is reasonable apprehension of such violence.”

The bill was not subject to the objection pointed out in the demurrer. Stephens v. Stephens, 233 Ala. 178, 170 So. 767.

Affirmed.

LIVINGSTON, SIMPSON and STAKE-LY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stephens v. Stephens
170 So. 767 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 So. 2d 11, 252 Ala. 19, 1949 Ala. LEXIS 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goggans-v-goggans-ala-1949.