Goffe v. Winfrey
This text of Goffe v. Winfrey (Goffe v. Winfrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUL J 1 tu09 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk, U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts
Damon Lloyd Goffe, ) ) Plaintiff, )
v. ) ) Civil Action No. 09 1438 ) Oprah Winfrey, ) ) Defendant. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff s pro se complaint, which
is accompanied by an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the
application and will dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Plaintiff, a resident of Bronx, New York, sues Oprah Winfrey and Harpo, Inc., for
copyright infringement. "[N]o civil action for infringement of the copyright in any United States
work shall be instituted until preregistration or registration of the copyright claim has been made
in accordance with this title [or] ... where the deposit, application, and fee required for
registration have been delivered to the Copyright Office in proper form and registration has been
refused[.]" 17 U.S.C. § 411(a). Plaintiff does not allege that he complied with the registration
provlSlons. The complaint therefore will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Goffe v.
Winfrey, 2008 WL 4787515 * 1 (S.D.N.Y., Oct. 31,2008) (finding same). A separate Order
accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
Date: July .Lf ,2009
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Goffe v. Winfrey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goffe-v-winfrey-dcd-2009.