Goffe v. Winfrey

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedJuly 31, 2009
DocketCivil Action No. 2009-1438
StatusPublished

This text of Goffe v. Winfrey (Goffe v. Winfrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goffe v. Winfrey, (D.D.C. 2009).

Opinion

FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUL J 1 tu09 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk, U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts

Damon Lloyd Goffe, ) ) Plaintiff, )

v. ) ) Civil Action No. 09 1438 ) Oprah Winfrey, ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff s pro se complaint, which

is accompanied by an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the

application and will dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Plaintiff, a resident of Bronx, New York, sues Oprah Winfrey and Harpo, Inc., for

copyright infringement. "[N]o civil action for infringement of the copyright in any United States

work shall be instituted until preregistration or registration of the copyright claim has been made

in accordance with this title [or] ... where the deposit, application, and fee required for

registration have been delivered to the Copyright Office in proper form and registration has been

refused[.]" 17 U.S.C. § 411(a). Plaintiff does not allege that he complied with the registration

provlSlons. The complaint therefore will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Goffe v.

Winfrey, 2008 WL 4787515 * 1 (S.D.N.Y., Oct. 31,2008) (finding same). A separate Order

accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

Date: July .Lf ,2009

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Goffe v. Winfrey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goffe-v-winfrey-dcd-2009.