Goff v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Goff v. State

1920 OK CR 73, 194 P. 250, 18 Okla. Crim. 713, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 219

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 10, 1920

DocketA-3456

StatusPublished

This text of 1920 OK CR 73 (Goff v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goff v. State, 1920 OK CR 73, 194 P. 250, 18 Okla. Crim. 713, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 219 (Okla. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, R. E. Goff, was convicted in the superior court of Greek county on a charge of selling whisky to one E. W. Taylor, and was! sentenced to be confined for 39 days in the county jail and pay a fine of $350 and the costs. From the judgment he appealed by filing in this court on September 5. 1918, a petition in error with case-made. No brief -has been filed. When the ease was called for final submission, no appearance was made on behalf of the plaintiff in error. An examination of the entire record fails to disclose anything whereof the plaintiff in error had just right of complaint.

The judgment is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, R. E. Goff, was convicted in the superior court of Greek county on a charge of selling whisky to one E. W. Taylor, and was! sentenced to be confined for 39 days in the county jail and pay a fine of $350 and the costs. From the judgment he appealed by filing in this court on September 5. 1918, a petition in error with case-made. No brief -has been filed. When the ease was called for final submission, no appearance was made on behalf of the plaintiff in error. An examination of the entire record fails to disclose anything whereof the plaintiff in error had just right of complaint.

The judgment is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1920 OK CR 73, 194 P. 250, 18 Okla. Crim. 713, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goff-v-state-oklacrimapp-1920.