Goff v. State
673 So. 2d 990, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5523, 1996 WL 280028
Opinion
We affirm without prejudice to appellant’s right to file a motion in the trial court with the verification required by Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and 3.987 within thirty days. See Weisman v. State, 651 So.2d 148 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).
The motion in this case does not appear to be facially defective, but for the absence of verification, in its allegations with respect to appellant’s plea agreement, counsel’s representations to the court with respect to same and counsel’s calculations as to sentence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goff v. State, 673 So. 2d 990, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5523, 1996 WL 280028 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
673 So. 2d 990 (Goff v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Troya v. State
817 So. 2d 932 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Thomas v. State
686 So. 2d 699 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)