Goff v. State
This text of 673 So. 2d 990 (Goff v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm without prejudice to appellant’s right to file a motion in the trial court with the verification required by Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and 3.987 within thirty days. See Weisman v. State, 651 So.2d 148 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).
The motion in this case does not appear to be facially defective, but for the absence of verification, in its allegations with respect to appellant’s plea agreement, counsel’s representations to the court with respect to same and counsel’s calculations as to sentence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
673 So. 2d 990, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5523, 1996 WL 280028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goff-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.