Goff v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Goff v. State

537 So. 2d 1128, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 370, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 456, 1989 WL 7513

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 3, 1989

DocketNo. 88-123

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 537 So. 2d 1128 (Goff v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goff v. State, 537 So. 2d 1128, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 370, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 456, 1989 WL 7513 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In Goff v. State, 512 So.2d 1095 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) we affirmed the conviction of Goff for conspiracy to traffic in 10,000 pounds or more of cannabis, but vacated the sentence of twenty-five years incarceration imposed by the trial court. The crime as charged requires a fifteen-year minimum mandatory sentence notwithstanding a recommended guidelines sentence of four and one-half to five and one-half years. The trial judge did not give any written reasons for exceeding the guidelines.

On remand, we directed that the trial judge “impose the minimum mandatory sentence of fifteen years,” noting that it was not necessary for the defendant to be present for resentencing.

Upon resentencing, a sentence of twenty-five years was again imposed with written reasons being given for exceeding the guidelines. This sentence exceeds the authority of the trial judge which is governed by our prior mandate. We, therefore, again vacate the sentence imposed and remand with directions to impose the minimum mandatory sentence of fifteen years. It is not necessary for the defendant to be present for resentencing.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and SCHOONOVER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI