Goff v. State

149 So. 13, 111 Fla. 82, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1912
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 15, 1933
StatusPublished

This text of 149 So. 13 (Goff v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goff v. State, 149 So. 13, 111 Fla. 82, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1912 (Fla. 1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case the Court is equally divided as to whether or not the judgment of the Circuit Court should be reversed or affirmed. Mr. Chief Justice Davis, Mr. Justice. Terrell and Mr. Justice Brown are of the opinion that the evidence is not legally sufficient to sustain the indictment accusing plaintiff in error of the desertion of his minor child. Mr. Justice Wi-iitfield, Mr. Justice Ellis and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that no reversible error has been made to appear and that the judgment should therefore be affirmed. The judgment is'accordingly affirmed on the authority of State v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 Sou. Rep. 51.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown • and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)
Griffith v. Alcocke
37 So. 47 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 So. 13, 111 Fla. 82, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goff-v-state-fla-1933.