Goff v. Lewis

252 A.D. 810, 299 N.Y.S. 29, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6353
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Goff v. Lewis. Read the opinion of the Court — 251 A.D. 919

Opinion

This judgment for costs was taken as a matter of course. Under the conditions which obtain here costs may be granted by the court but not otherwise. ~ (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1476.) The parties stipulate that the court may consider this matter as though a reargument had been granted. [See ante, p. 706. See, also, 251 App. Div. 919.] Judgment, dated January 2, 1936, wherein Leona M. Crisp recovered a judgment for costs and disbursements, amounting to $96.75, against Clarence Goff, the plaintiff in the action, and which judgment appears in the record on appeal at pages 130 and 131, is reversed, on the law and facts, with costs in this court to the appellant Goff. Hill, P. J., Rhodes Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goff v. Lewis, 252 A.D. 810, 299 N.Y.S. 29, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6353 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

252 A.D. 810 (Goff v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.