Goff v. Ehrlich
776 So. 2d 1011, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 358, 2001 WL 43056
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 19, 2001·No. No. 5D00-1740·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Goff was the successful candidate for the Seminole County School Board who, after the election, sued his opponent for allegedly violating the provisions of Chapter 106, Florida Statutes, by not reporting a sup[1012]*1012porter’s payment of a pre-election and post-election legal challenge to Goffs qualifying residency as a contribution to the campaign. Because we find that Chapter 106 does not confer a private right of action,1 we affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the complaint.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goff v. Ehrlich, 776 So. 2d 1011, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 358, 2001 WL 43056 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
776 So. 2d 1011 (Goff v. Ehrlich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ryan C. Torrens v. Sean Shaw, Ken Detzner, in his official capacity as the Secretary of State Department of State, Division of Elections
257 So. 3d 168 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Schurr v. Sanchez-Gronlier
937 So. 2d 1166 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)