Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Goff v. Ehrlich

Goff v. Ehrlich

776 So. 2d 1011, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 358, 2001 WL 43056
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 19, 2001
DocketNo. 5D00-1740
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 776 So. 2d 1011 (Goff v. Ehrlich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goff v. Ehrlich, 776 So. 2d 1011, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 358, 2001 WL 43056 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

HARRIS, J.

Goff was the successful candidate for the Seminole County School Board who, after the election, sued his opponent for allegedly violating the provisions of Chapter 106, Florida Statutes, by not reporting a sup[1012]*1012porter’s payment of a pre-election and post-election legal challenge to Goffs qualifying residency as a contribution to the campaign. Because we find that Chapter 106 does not confer a private right of action,1 we affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the complaint.

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, C.J., and PLEUS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ryan C. Torrens v. Sean Shaw, Ken Detzner, in his official capacity as the Secretary of State Department of State, Division of Elections
257 So. 3d 168 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Schurr v. Sanchez-Gronlier
937 So. 2d 1166 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
776 So. 2d 1011, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 358, 2001 WL 43056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goff-v-ehrlich-fladistctapp-2001.