Goetz v. Voelinger
99 Mass. 504
Opinion
It is admitted that the plaintiff is a foreignei and never came to this country till about two years ago. The action therefore is not barred by our statute of limitations, Gen. Sts. c. 155, §§ 1, 6. See cases cited by the plaintiff’s counsel.
Judgment for the plaintiff; and assessor to be appointed according to agreement of the parties.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goetz v. Voelinger, 99 Mass. 504 (Mass. 1868).
99 Mass. 504 (Goetz v. Voelinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chuchuru v. Chutchurru
185 F.2d 62 (Tenth Circuit, 1950)
Warner & Bailey Co. v. Fox
3 Mass. App. Div. 381 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1938)
Mason, Chapin & Co. v. Union Mills Paper Manufacturing Co.
32 A. 311 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1895)
In re Blandin
3 F. Cas. 669 (D. Massachusetts, 1871)