Goetz v. Ambs

22 Mo. 170
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedOctober 15, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 22 Mo. 170 (Goetz v. Ambs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goetz v. Ambs, 22 Mo. 170 (Mo. 1855).

Opinion

Scott, Judge

delivered the opinion of the court.

This court does not interfere with the verdict of a jury on the ground that it is against the weight of evidence. If, however, upon the report of the evidence on a trial, we were warranted in granting a new trial, we do not know how we would resist such-an application on this occasion. As a new trial will be granted on account of the excessiveness of the damages, we deem it inappropriate to make any comments on the case. Upon looking over the record, we are satisfied that the ends of justice will be subserved by granting a new trial; although the injury sus[173]*173tained was a serious one, we do not tbink the circumstances warranted so heavy a verdict.

The judgment is reversed, and a new trial ordered,

with the concurrence of Judge Ryland.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Southern Real Estate & Financial Co. v. Bankers Surety Co.
207 S.W. 506 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1918)
Partello v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
145 S.W. 55 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1912)
Jennings v. Appleman
139 S.W. 817 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1911)
Fischer v. City of St. Louis
88 S.W. 82 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1905)
Burdict v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
26 L.R.A. 384 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894)
Leahy v. Davis
25 S.W. 941 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894)
Railway Co. v. Robbins
21 S.W. 886 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1893)
Goetz v. Ambs
27 Mo. 28 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1858)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Mo. 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goetz-v-ambs-mo-1855.