Goetz-Haddad v. Pathmark Supermarkets
837 N.E.2d 730, 5 N.Y.3d 821, 804 N.Y.S.2d 31, 2005 N.Y. LEXIS 2589
This text of 837 N.E.2d 730 (Goetz-Haddad v. Pathmark Supermarkets) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Goetz-Haddad v. Pathmark Supermarkets, 837 N.E.2d 730, 5 N.Y.3d 821, 804 N.Y.S.2d 31, 2005 N.Y. LEXIS 2589 (N.Y. 2005).
Opinion
Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no appeal lies as of right from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (CPLR 5601).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
837 N.E.2d 730, 5 N.Y.3d 821, 804 N.Y.S.2d 31, 2005 N.Y. LEXIS 2589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goetz-haddad-v-pathmark-supermarkets-ny-2005.