Goetting v. Manhattan Railway Co.

New York Supreme Court

Goetting v. Manhattan Railway Co.

33 N.Y.S. 1128, 93 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618, 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 869

DecidedApril 11, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 33 N.Y.S. 1128 (Goetting v. Manhattan Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goetting v. Manhattan Railway Co., 33 N.Y.S. 1128, 93 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618, 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 869 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

PER GURIAB1.

The only question which it is necessary to consider is that in regard to the amount of the award. The other points which have been raised upon this appeal have been disposed of in. previous cases, and it is not necessary now to rediscuss them. We think, upon an examination of the testimony, that the award is larger than the evidence warranted. It seems to us that the same should be reduced to the sum of $1,500 fee damage, and $931.50 rental damage, and for these amounts the judgments should be affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER GURIAB1.

The only question which it is necessary to consider is that in regard to the amount of the award. The other points which have been raised upon this appeal have been disposed of in. previous cases, and it is not necessary now to rediscuss them. We think, upon an examination of the testimony, that the award is larger than the evidence warranted. It seems to us that the same should be reduced to the sum of $1,500 fee damage, and $931.50 rental damage, and for these amounts the judgments should be affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 N.Y.S. 1128, 93 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618, 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goetting-v-manhattan-railway-co-nysupct-1895.