Goetschius v. Board of Education of the Greenburgh Eleven Union Free School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goetschius v. Board of Education of the Greenburgh Eleven Union Free School District

281 A.D.2d 418, 721 N.Y.S.2d 272

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 5, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 281 A.D.2d 418 (Goetschius v. Board of Education of the Greenburgh Eleven Union Free School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goetschius v. Board of Education of the Greenburgh Eleven Union Free School District, 281 A.D.2d 418, 721 N.Y.S.2d 272 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review the determinations made at a meeting of the Board of Education of the Greenburgh Eleven Union Free School District on June 18, 1997, the appeal is from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered May 17, 1999, which, inter alia, annulled certain determinations that were made in violation of the Open Meetings Law and awarded an attorneys’ fee to the petitioners.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs (see, Matter of Goetschius v Board of Educ., 281AD2d416 [decided herewith]). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Luciano and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review the determinations made at a meeting of the Board of Education of the Greenburgh Eleven Union Free School District on June 18, 1997, the appeal is from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered May 17, 1999, which, inter alia, annulled certain determinations that were made in violation of the Open Meetings Law and awarded an attorneys’ fee to the petitioners.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs (see, Matter of Goetschius v Board of Educ., 281AD2d416 [decided herewith]). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Luciano and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D.2d 418, 721 N.Y.S.2d 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goetschius-v-board-of-education-of-the-greenburgh-eleven-union-free-school-nyappdiv-2001.