Goess v. Ehret

13 F. Supp. 630, 1936 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1503
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 F. Supp. 630 (Goess v. Ehret) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goess v. Ehret, 13 F. Supp. 630, 1936 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1503 (S.D.N.Y. 1936).

Opinion

MOSCO WITZ, District Judge.

This action was brought to recover the sum of $252,054.92 on a promissory note. A jury trial was waived. A counterclaim was interposed based upon fraud on the part of the officers of the Harriman National Bank in the sale of its own stock.

Defendant purchased 100 shares of stock of the bank on certain misrepresentations made by Harriman. These shares of stock sold to the defendant were sold out of the Harriman Securities Corporation’s suspense account. The amount of the price was credited to the securities corporation.

Defendant by way of relief requests that the bank take back the shares of its own stock and pay to the defendant the purchase price of these shares. This relief cannot be granted. Awotin v. Atlas Exchange Nat. Bank, 295 U.S. 209, 55 S. Ct. 674, 79 L.Ed. 1393.

The bank was not permitted to sell stock. If it attempted to do. so, a person dealing with it would have no recourse for any loss that might occur. There can be no relief in this case.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Settle findings and decree on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Rosenbaum
175 Misc. 295 (New York Supreme Court, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 F. Supp. 630, 1936 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goess-v-ehret-nysd-1936.