Goerlich v. Diana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goerlich v. Diana

102 A.D.2d 863, 477 N.Y.S.2d 303, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19066

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 18, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 102 A.D.2d 863 (Goerlich v. Diana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goerlich v. Diana, 102 A.D.2d 863, 477 N.Y.S.2d 303, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19066 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Wager, J.), dated June 7, 1983, as, in granting his motion to dismiss the complaint, did so unless plaintiff appeared for an examination before trial on a set date and unless her (former) attorney paid $200 in costs to defendant’s attorney. H Order modified, on the facts, by increasing the amount of costs to be paid by plaintiff’s former attorney to $750. As so modified, order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs to defendant. Plaintiff’s former attorney’s time to pay the $750 is extended until 30 days after service upon him of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry, f The conduct of plaintiff’s former attorney was such that it warrants an increase in the amount of costs to be paid by him. Bracken, J. P., O’Connor, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Wager, J.), dated June 7, 1983, as, in granting his motion to dismiss the complaint, did so unless plaintiff appeared for an examination before trial on a set date and unless her (former) attorney paid $200 in costs to defendant’s attorney. H Order modified, on the facts, by increasing the amount of costs to be paid by plaintiff’s former attorney to $750. As so modified, order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs to defendant. Plaintiff’s former attorney’s time to pay the $750 is extended until 30 days after service upon him of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry, f The conduct of plaintiff’s former attorney was such that it warrants an increase in the amount of costs to be paid by him. Bracken, J. P., O’Connor, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 A.D.2d 863, 477 N.Y.S.2d 303, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goerlich-v-diana-nyappdiv-1984.