Goeres v. Charles Schwab & Co.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order granting the motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Med. Servs., Inc., — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 1869, 1875, 164 L.Ed.2d 612 (2006), does not undermine the district court’s reasoning and Peralta v. Hispanic Business, Inc., 419 F.3d 1064, 1076 (9th Cir.2005), supports it.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
220 F. App'x 663 (Goeres v. Charles Schwab & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.